Print Page | Close Window

Caliber and bullet for elk hunt

Printed From: OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc.
Category: Hunting, Fishing & General Outdoors
Forum Name: General Hunting
Forum Description: Techniques, tips, stories, general discussion, etc.
URL: http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=45198
Printed Date: August/23/2019 at 10:26
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Caliber and bullet for elk hunt
Posted By: Whale
Subject: Caliber and bullet for elk hunt
Date Posted: October/26/2018 at 15:03
I have had no success in obtaining an elk tag. So I am now inquiring about guided elk hunts in the US and Canada. Just wondering what caliber and bullet you elk hunters use.



Replies:
Posted By: Peddler
Date Posted: October/26/2018 at 15:57
You will now receive at least 25 opinions ranging from 6.5x55 to .458 lott😂💥.

-------------
When you are dead, you don't know you are dead.It is difficult only for others.

It is the same when you are stupid.


Posted By: supertool73
Date Posted: October/26/2018 at 16:00
My fam has killed elk with .243, .308, 7mag, 300 savage, 300 mag, 45-70.  I hunted this year with a 6.5 creed, but didn't get a chance to shoot one.

Any decent size rifle caliber will do.  Its most about where you shoot them than anything.  Bring one that you are very confident with and that you shoot well. 


-------------
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."


Posted By: Son of Ed
Date Posted: October/26/2018 at 18:50
I agree with supertool, but after reading about everyone's adventures, I think I would bring a BIG gun!!  Hahaha!  

If Rancid Koolaid said a 300 Winchester didn't drop an elk in his tracks, I would bring something BIGGER!!  


Image result for 338 win




Image result for 9.3 X 62 ammo






Image result for george burns

" Why not? "   








-------------
Visit the Ed Show


Posted By: Scrumbag
Date Posted: October/27/2018 at 03:17
9.3x62 I'm sure would be excellent in the timber though not so flat shooting if you need a longer shot

-------------
Was sure I had a point when I started this post...


Posted By: Kickboxer
Date Posted: October/27/2018 at 05:14
 .220 Swift is my choice for elk...go big or go home...

-------------
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.

There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living


Posted By: Son of Ed
Date Posted: October/27/2018 at 08:49
Robert Ruark shot a hyena in Africa with a 220 Swift! The bullet just flattened out on his hide and Ruark was cussing that rifle for the rest of the book!  Ha!  

Image result for horn of the hunter




-------------
Visit the Ed Show


Posted By: Son of Ed
Date Posted: October/27/2018 at 08:53
...and yet, years ago people were actually KILLING tigers with the 22 Savage Hi-Power!!   


Harry Caldwells Tiger



http://www.acant.org.au/Articles/LeverGun.html


http://www.acant.org.au/Articles/LeverGun.html - http://www.acant.org.au/Articles/LeverGun.html




-------------
Visit the Ed Show


Posted By: urbaneruralite
Date Posted: October/27/2018 at 20:29
When going guided, consult the guide. It helps if you and the guide are on the same page as to what your gun will do. 


Posted By: Whale
Date Posted: November/04/2018 at 12:07
 Thank you everyone who posted a response to my question. In my haste to post, I should have asked who used a .270, 30-06 or 7mm Rem Mag? The reason being my elbow and shoulder surgeries. These are the calibers that I can tolerate with cortisone injections. If I need revision surgery there will be no hunting in the future. Again, thank you everyone.


Posted By: RifleDude
Date Posted: November/04/2018 at 21:34
Originally posted by Whale Whale wrote:

 Thank you everyone who posted a response to my question. In my haste to post, I should have asked who used a .270, 30-06 or 7mm Rem Mag? The reason being my elbow and shoulder surgeries. These are the calibers that I can tolerate with cortisone injections. If I need revision surgery there will be no hunting in the future. Again, thank you everyone.

Of those, I've used 7 mag on elk with success, and have seen several elk killed by all 3 of those chamberings. All 3 are adequate for the job. The bullet used and placement of said bullet is more important than the cartridge. Pick a good controlled expansion bullet that shoots well in your rifle. Pick something with a reputation for being tough and retaining a decent % of its weight after expansion, either in a monometal design or bonded core. Pick bullets on the heavier side of the range for their respective calibers; ex: 140 - 150 gr. in .277", 150 - 175 gr. in .284", 180 - 200+ gr. in .308".
Examples: Barnes LRX or TTSX, Hornady GMX or ELD-X, Nosler Accubond, Accubond LR or E-Tip, Trophy Bonded Bear Claw or Tip, etc.
One of our fellow OT members makes Badlands Precision Bulldozer bullets, which are an aluminum tipped monometal bullet, and they would be a good choice as well. They shoot well and are very tough.


-------------
Ted


Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle.


Posted By: koshkin
Date Posted: November/12/2018 at 17:07
I suspect that RifleDude is right on the money.  

I am not much of a hunter, but I spend a lot of time shooting with other people.  I think it is really critical to make sure you are shooting a caliber you can shoot well without worrying about your hurt shoulder and all that.

The quality of modern bullets is such that cartridge differences for most North American game are not that critical (within reason).  

For what it is worth, bullets from Badlands Precision seem to fly faster than I expected (likely due to short bearing surface), so you can pick up a bit of extra energy that way.

If your shoulder hurts, use your 270 with the right bullet.

ILya


-------------
http://www.opticsthoughts.com - www.opticsthoughts.com
http://fb.me/DarkLordOfOptics - Facebook
https://www.instagram.com/darklordofoptics/ - Instagram


Posted By: BryceCla
Date Posted: November/13/2018 at 06:31
Originally posted by Peddler Peddler wrote:

You will now receive at least 25 opinions ranging from 6.5x55 to .458 lott😂💥.

Ain't that the truth. And after a few seasons, he will have tried at least 25 of those options as well. haha


-------------
Hi!


Posted By: mike650
Date Posted: November/13/2018 at 06:48
7mm Winkle. 😉

-------------
Fish to Live, Live to Hunt


Posted By: urbaneruralite
Date Posted: November/13/2018 at 08:04
For reasons I cannot quantify, I find the /06 class cartridges deliver more recoil to my shoulder than .308 class. If your guide is confident in providing opportunities inside 300 yards, take whatever you like that throws at least an 140gr bullet and have fun.



Posted By: supertool73
Date Posted: November/13/2018 at 09:18
Probably because they have more powder in them vs the comparable caliber short case.  Embarrassed


-------------
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."


Posted By: Rancid Coolaid
Date Posted: November/13/2018 at 09:42
 I've only been on a few elk hunts but was successful on the first (sorta, won't derail this thread with that story).  I hunt quite a bit and do tend to over-gun in an effort to avoid under-gunning.  My mindset is an animal can't be "too dead" but can definitely be "not dead enough."

If you are recoil-sensitive, I'd be comfortable with a 308 or even 7mm-08, so long as you run the right bullets.

I've had great success with Barnes TTSX and TSX.  If it is something I care to recover, I shoot it with a Barnes projectile.

But there are other good bullets.

I do favor 300WM, much of it is confidence and experience, some is simple voodoo.

Some states allow suppressed hunting, and a can on a thumper takes MUCH of the thump away, at least for the shooter.



-------------
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.


Posted By: Kickboxer
Date Posted: November/14/2018 at 06:16
 Can't go wrong with .300 WinMag.  On my last Axis hunt (typically respected as at least as "tough" to take as elk) I used .300 WinMag 190gr Black Hills BTHP Sierra Match King.  Heart and lung shot... DRT. I've always really liked this caliber.  My opinion, can be used for just about any type of hunting.  Nothing I'd be fearful to face with it... maybe the Hulk, but he absorbs and dissolves bullets (that don't bounce off)...

-------------
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.

There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living


Posted By: Rancid Coolaid
Date Posted: November/14/2018 at 08:53
 As someone will point it out:  Sierra explicitly states that they do not recommend Matchkings for most hunting applications.  That said, obviously they work, but they are not a purpose-build hunting bullet, and are actually purpose-built for a different purpose.

I too have hunted with matchkings, there is much to be said for the confidence that arises from knowing exactly where the round will strike within 600 yards of my shooting position. Though the Barnes bullets I like for hunting don't have the same BC or the same reputation for extreme precision and accuracy, they much more effectively transfer energy from bullet to target.

In closing, 300 Winchester Magnum is a great caliber for almost anything on this continent - and for many, many species on the other continents.

Though it is not for the recoil-sensitive - at least in most rifle configurations that do not include a suppressor.


-------------
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.


Posted By: urbaneruralite
Date Posted: November/14/2018 at 11:47
Originally posted by supertool73 supertool73 wrote:

Probably because they have more powder in them vs the comparable caliber short case.  Embarrassed

Ha. I set myself up for that. 

No, I mean if loaded the same. I perceive that a light .270 load kicks more than the equivalent .260 load in similar weight rifles. I went through this after my wife rejected a .270 loaded for low recoil in favor of a 7mm08. By the numbers it should be the same. If anything I would think the wider bullet would push back more. There was no arguing it with her. I tried it a couple different ways with different -08 and -06 after that. Those -08s always seemed easier on me. 

Another anomaly is while I prefer short actions, I shoot a long action more accurately. There should be no difference, but I have shown it often enough that I don't take some shots on game with my preferred short action rifles. 

These things are subjective and perhaps not useful to OP, but might be worth considering all the same.


Posted By: koshkin
Date Posted: November/14/2018 at 12:21
Originally posted by urbaneruralite urbaneruralite wrote:

Originally posted by supertool73 supertool73 wrote:

Probably because they have more powder in them vs the comparable caliber short case.  Embarrassed

Ha. I set myself up for that. 

No, I mean if loaded the same. I perceive that a light .270 load kicks more than the equivalent .260 load in similar weight rifles. I went through this after my wife rejected a .270 loaded for low recoil in favor of a 7mm08. By the numbers it should be the same. If anything I would think the wider bullet would push back more. There was no arguing it with her. I tried it a couple different ways with different -08 and -06 after that. Those -08s always seemed easier on me. 

Another anomaly is while I prefer short actions, I shoot a long action more accurately. There should be no difference, but I have shown it often enough that I don't take some shots on game with my preferred short action rifles. 

These things are subjective and perhaps not useful to OP, but might be worth considering all the same.

Felt recoil is really impacted by stock shape (drop) and recoil pad size, so keep that in mind when comparing different rifles.

As Jason pointed out, with 270Win it will take a little more powder to get the same weight bullet moving at the same speed, which will also make it a kick a touch more.  That is not a very big difference though.

Stock shape is usually the most important actor between broadly similar cartridges.

I remember, the first time I shot the CZ550 308Win with its hog back stock off the bench, I thought it was a recoil beast.  Upon further analysis, it turned out that the hog back stock is designed for irons and with as scope on and off the bench, it smacks you in the face pretty nicely (works quite well for shooting off hand though). 

ILya


-------------
http://www.opticsthoughts.com - www.opticsthoughts.com
http://fb.me/DarkLordOfOptics - Facebook
https://www.instagram.com/darklordofoptics/ - Instagram


Posted By: RifleDude
Date Posted: November/14/2018 at 13:49
Originally posted by urbaneruralite urbaneruralite wrote:

Another anomaly is while I prefer short actions, I shoot a long action more accurately. There should be no difference, but I have shown it often enough that I don't take some shots on game with my preferred short action rifles.


Whatever factor is contributing to this observation, it isn’t related to action length or the cartridges chambered in same. Most likely, the long action rifles you’ve been shooting either happen to have better barrels, better triggers, stocks that fit you better, were shooting loads that were better tuned to the rifles, or some other logical mechanical factors involved. Action length has no bearing whatsoever on either how well a given rifle shoots or how well a person shoots said rifle, and certainly not in favor of the long action. If that were the case, all competitive benchrest shooters - the shooting sport where the utmost inherent precision possible is demanded - would be using long actions and long action cartridges, and they aren’t. The overwhelming majority of them are using short actions and short action rounds such as 6 PPC. You should never draw any conclusions about any rifle’s potential precision based on action length, as there is no correlation to action length.

-------------
Ted


Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle.


Posted By: urbaneruralite
Date Posted: November/14/2018 at 22:48
The point about the powder is a good one. However, you are talking about a grain of three of powder and maybe 100 fps. Those small values would seem to disappear when consider things like faster or slow barrels and a person's perception or build. Maybe not, though, because I agree the /06 class kicks more.

Action length absolutely affects how well you can hit if one suits you better. The mechanical accuracy may be finer with a different rifle, but what works on a bench is not necessarily what works for a particular person from field positions. I don't doubt some people find the opposite of what I do, but for me, if I want to hit the mark I tote a different rifle than just what I like to shoot. 

FWIW, my main hunting rifles are all Browning A-Bolts with the same style stock. I really like my 25 WSSM. It prints bugholes off the bench. I hit my mark better with the same gun in .300WM. Groups from that one are slightly larger.


Posted By: RifleDude
Date Posted: November/15/2018 at 05:19
Originally posted by urbaneruralite urbaneruralite wrote:

Action length absolutely affects how well you can hit if one suits you better. The mechanical accuracy may be finer with a different rifle, but what works on a bench is not necessarily what works for a particular person from field positions.


Not trying to be combative, but no sir; it absolutely has no influence whatsoever. Action length is totally transparent in the system, because all the factors that affect how well you shoot a given rifle platform are the things you are in contact with during the shot - the stock shape/ ergonomics and trigger - along with how good the barrel is, and whether the load is well tuned to the rifle. Weight can play a factor here too, but a particular short action rifle isn’t necessarily lighter than a long action rifle. You are not interacting with the action during the shot, not touching it, and no part of your body is in contact with it or influenced by it in any way while you are taking the shot, so the action length isn’t having any influence in the shot cycle. The only time you are manipulating the action is during the time the bullet has already long ago exited the barrel.

Action length is completely a non-factor in how well you shoot a rifle, because you can get the same length of pull, same center of gravity, same barrel length, same weight, same stock ergonomics, and same trigger designs in short action rifles as long. Whatever you are observing that contribute to how well you shoot with either are related to something else besides that 1” difference in receiver length.

The point about bench shooting is related to inherent precision of the rifle itself. No matter the shooting position, if the rifle itself isn’t mechanically sound and capable of good precision, it can “suit you” and feel right in your hands all day long, but it is going to limit your ability to shoot it well if it doesn’t shoot well to begin with.

-------------
Ted


Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle.


Posted By: Son of Ed
Date Posted: November/18/2018 at 01:05
A 30-06 will do....take a 300 Winchester Magnum if you are spooky....





-------------
Visit the Ed Show


Posted By: Lockjaw
Date Posted: November/19/2018 at 07:05
Why not get a BAR if you are recoil sensitive? I don't think they are to heavy. 

I have a 700BDL 270 in a Hogue stock, which tames it nicely. The worst kicking gun I ever owned was a Savage 110 in 270. BRUTAL. 

I am shooting 178 ELD-X precision hunter in my 308 this year, see how I like it. When I ran it thru Nikon's spot on program, it looks like it carries the energy downrange nicely. 

When I compare the 270 to the 308, I will take the 308 all day long. I can shoot mine for hours, its a 700 SPS AAC-SD. Same stock as 270. Bed block Hogue. Big fan of that stock for taming recoil, its not the lightest out there though. I think the weights are actually quite similar the 270 may weigh a little more. 

We had a guy shoot a doe at my hunting club a few years ago with a 338 Win Mag. We never found it. We found hair and a good blood trail, but no deer. 

So it just goes to show you... he swapped it for a 30-06. 

If you want a soft shooter, the 7-08 would be the way to go. 





Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net