OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Scopes > Rifle Scopes
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - On the SWFA SS 3-9x42 Tactical Riflescope
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

On the SWFA SS 3-9x42 Tactical Riflescope

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
gcp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: May/19/2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gcp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: On the SWFA SS 3-9x42 Tactical Riflescope
    Posted: August/01/2010 at 07:37

rave reviews by those that own it, to include ILya, so I am attempting to decide it, the Minox ZA-3, Meopta MeoPro and Zeiss Conquest but I sure do love the #4 reticle on the Meopta for $399!

 

My old 16X SS has been a solid scope, and even though I've not used it much I've found that I have to be spot on behind it to properly acquire/sustain the target picture. I retrospect I should have probably gone with the 10X.....


Back to Top
gcp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: May/19/2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gcp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 07:41
I obviously left off the first part of the post above so here it is once again, complete. (btw, how does one edit the original post around here)?
 
Originally posted by gcp gcp wrote:

Is the glass on the SS 3-9x42 HD? It gets rave reviews by those that own it, to include

ILya, so I am attempting to decide it, the Minox ZA-3, Meopta MeoPro and Zeiss Conquest but I sure do love the #4 reticle on the Meopta for $399!

 

My old 16X SS has been a solid scope, and even though I've not used it much one has to be spot on behind it to properly acquire the target. I retrospect I should have probably bought the 10X.....

rave reviews by those that own it, to include ILya, so I am attempting to decide it, the Minox ZA-3, Meopta MeoPro and Zeiss Conquest but I sure do love the #4 reticle on the Meopta for $399!

 

My old 16X SS has been a solid scope, and even though I've not used it much I've found that I have to be spot on behind it to properly acquire/sustain the target picture. I retrospect I should have probably gone with the 10X.....


Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 08:33
Will this scope be used for big game hunting or what, primarily?
 
Think you need 50 posts to edit.  
Back to Top
gcp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: May/19/2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gcp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 15:30
Target shooting for the most parts, with hogs and deer thrown in for good measure.
The magic naumber's 50? I better pick up the pace then Yippee
Back to Top
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cheaptrick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 17:09
I question how good a FFP Mil Dot reticle would be in LOW light conditions while hunting.
I think you'd be better served with a #4 reticle, in that regard. At least where I hunt here in NC.
 
I own and love the 3-9x SS, but that Mil Dot reticle might get thin in very low light and thick brush.      
If your not needing or wanting a Mil Dot to range, than I feel there are other reticles that may serve you better for hunting.
The German 4 allows you to hunt and target shoot in legal hunting hours, without loosing the reticle in the low light/brush.
 
The 3-9x SS is a terrific scope and an insane value, so please don't think I'm trying to talk you out of it.     


Edited by cheaptrick - August/01/2010 at 17:39
Back to Top
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8558
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tahqua Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 17:41
I spent last winter coyote hunting with the SS. The reticle gets better in low light if the magnification is cranked up to around 6X. The glass is outstanding for the money.
I dog hunt with my brother who has the R1 Meostar with a 4A. It is an excellent low light scope. It likewise has excellent glass.
For hunting I'll take the 4A any day of the week. I have been using mil-dot scopes in the last year or so for hunting and I'm getting by. But, the 4A is still the winner for low light given comparable glass.

Doug
Back to Top
gcp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: May/19/2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gcp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 19:03

I am blessed to own my own land so I don't have to worry about hunting in low light or thick brush but you're exactly right guys, I am sold on the $4 reticle and the Meopta for the $ can't be beat, even though I dislike the way it looks. But before I pull the trigger I'd like to make certain I'll be happy with it that's why I am also entertaining the 3x9SS. If it has the better glass and better durability then I’ll probably go with it.

Back to Top
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8558
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tahqua Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 19:13
I hauled my 22-250 around a bit through some very heavy cover. Sometimes I was crawling on my hands and knees under dead falls. That doesn't really address the reliability of the SS. But it did tell me that my worries about the tactical knobs turning on me while on the move were unfounded.
The SS is a sturdy scope for sure. If you get the chance to handle one you will know.
Doug
Back to Top
gcp View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: May/19/2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gcp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/01/2010 at 19:47
I know the SSs are rugged from my 16X....
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.227 seconds.