OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Scopes > Rifle Scopes
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Zeiss Victory Vs Diavari
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

Zeiss Victory Vs Diavari

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
gremcat View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: January/17/2012
Location: Raleigh NC
Status: Offline
Points: 99
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gremcat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Zeiss Victory Vs Diavari
    Posted: January/01/2014 at 19:59
So in another thread I posted my content with a 1.8-5.5x38 conquest. I am thinking of getting a Victory for my Finnlight. I am looking at the 1.5 Victory V Illuminated for roughly the same price as a Victory Divari on samplelist in the same power range. Which is superior? I have tried the same power range in a Conquest and it is awesome for the hunting I do. I hated the 2.5-8 Zeiss and the VX3 doesn't even compare to ky Conquest. The only scope that has been the same quality was the Kahles I sold on here. Should I look at a used Kahles 2-8 or is one of the Zeiss superior? Not rich but trying to build the gun I can grow old with.
Thanks for the help.
Back to Top
Oldtrader3 View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: May/16/2009
Location: WA (state)
Status: Offline
Points: 445
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Oldtrader3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/17/2014 at 00:23
The Zeiss Diavari V/VM is the same scope with Lotutec moisture coating added to the Diavari Victory.  Optically, they are identical.  I would buy the one that I liked the features on or the cheaper of the two.
CDR3
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.162 seconds.